Click here
or on the image above to watch Ranking Member Capito’s questions.
HIGHLIGHTS:
LIABILITIES FOR WATER
TREATMENT FACILITIES: “I mentioned a
possible case study of a wastewater plant that would remove PFOA or PFOS from
the water in terms of cleaning it, but then have biosolids left over and the
disposal of those. There is some concern about what would the liabilities be?
They didn’t create it. They’re trying to clean it up. Yet they have to dispose
of that. If you could clarify the liability issue, what you all are looking
at?”
PFOA AND PFOS IN DRINKING
WATER: “There is a level right now
that is suggested for safety. In your strategic roadmap has done something that
I’ve been pressing for both through the last administration and this one: to
set a definitive level that’s science-based so we can know what our kids and
grandkids are drinking and what we’re drinking at an acceptable level. But in
the roadmap, the length of time that this is going to take is very frustrating
to me. Because we’ve been looking at this—gosh, I’ve probably been involved in
this for two or three years. Why is it going to take so long when we know the
Office of Water can move more quickly?”
PRIORITIZING SAFE DRINKING
WATER: “Looking through the roadmap,
all the different aspects of this, there’s a lot in there. There’s a lot of
things to do. I would urge you—because I think this drinking water level is so
very important—to prioritize this. If not the top then near the top of the list
because of the impact it will have on all of us as a country.”
# # #